Main Electric, Ltd. v. Printz Services Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where party refused to execute satisfaction of judgment after receiving payments, there was no intention to settle its claims on appeal
• “[T]his statement is conclusory and made without analyzing the contract terms and appears as dictum.”
• “Dictum is not the law of the case and is not controlling precedent.”
• stating dictum is not controlling precedent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).