Main Cornice Works, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the defendants’ 18 argument to strike allegations as impertinent because they that could not be admitted as 19 evidence
• denying motion to strike allegations in 6 complaint based on “unripe” evidentiary objections
• “[A] court 17 must deny the motion to strike if any doubt exists whether the allegations in the pleadings 18 might be relevant in the action.” (quoting Montecino v. Spherion Corp., 427 F. Supp. 2d 19 965, 967 (C.D. Cal. 2006))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).