Mailloux v. Elxnit

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that price controls “did not extend to the calculation of royalty owed to the Osage Tribe under the 1974 Regulations”
• holding that, in the absence of accurate historical royalty and trust records, “[t]he Osage Tribe is entitled to damages reasonably estimated based on existing information”
• holding that the 1974 Regulations required royalty payments to based on the higher of the actual selling price or the highest posted or offered price
• holding that, in the in the absence of accurate historical royalty and trust records, “[t]he Osage Tribe is entitled to damages reasonably estimated based on existing information”
• holding that in the in the absence of accurate historical royalty and trust records, “[t]he Osage Tribe is entitled to damages reasonably estimated based on existing information”
• noting that neither Mr. Martin nor Mr. Chavarria “were at Treasury or Interior at the time”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).