Skip to main content

Mailer v. Mailer

Citations

  • 455 N.E.2d 1211
  • 390 Mass. 371
  • 1983 Mass. LEXIS 1719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the public nature of the information conveyed did not merit disqualification of later counsel in the same matter
  • whether a client has paid an attorney “a fee is not conclusive as to the existence of [an] attorney-client relationship”
  • information regarding the plaintiffs financial position was already known by defendant, hence there could be no compromising disclosure
  • award of rehabilitative alimony appropriate where the judge properly weighed the statutory factors against detailed findings of fact
  • where lawyer was not disqualified by conflict because information learned in one hour interview with plaintiff was matter of public record and not used against plaintiff at trial
  • no attorney-client relationship where it was unlikely that confidential information was exchanged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Wilkins, Nolan, Lynch, O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.