Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 11/8/1983
Mailer v. Mailer
Citations
- 455 N.E.2d 1211
- 390 Mass. 371
- 1983 Mass. LEXIS 1719
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the public nature of the information conveyed did not merit disqualification of later counsel in the same matter
- whether a client has paid an attorney “a fee is not conclusive as to the existence of [an] attorney-client relationship”
- information regarding the plaintiffs financial position was already known by defendant, hence there could be no compromising disclosure
- award of rehabilitative alimony appropriate where the judge properly weighed the statutory factors against detailed findings of fact
- where lawyer was not disqualified by conflict because information learned in one hour interview with plaintiff was matter of public record and not used against plaintiff at trial
- no attorney-client relationship where it was unlikely that confidential information was exchanged
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hennessey, Wilkins, Nolan, Lynch, O'Connor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chase Precast v. JOHN J. PAONESSA CO., COMMONWEALTHMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-02-20· cited 57×
- Fechtor v. FechtorMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1989-02-14· cited 55×
- Bays v. TheranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1994-09-23· cited 51×
- Commonwealth v. GoldmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-07-29· cited 48×
- Knights of Columbus Federal Credit Union v. SalisburyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1985-01-22· cited 36×
- Green v. Montgomery County, Ala.M.D. Alabama· 1992-01-27· cited 31×
- Smaland Beach Ass'n v. GenovaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2012-01-05· cited 27×
- Derrickson v. DerricksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-04-29· cited 21×
- Freedman v. FreedmanMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2000-06-27· cited 18×
- Slade v. OrmsbyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2007-07-11· cited 18×
- DiLuzio v. United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1984-02-16· cited 17×
- Adlakha v. AdlakhaMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2006-03-31· cited 14×
- Steinert v. SteinertMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2008-12-04· cited 14×
- Marr v. Back Bay Architectural CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-03-25· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. Morgan RV Resorts, LLCMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2013-07-09· cited 11×
- DeLoury v. DelouryMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1986-08-01· cited 10×
- Guardianship of HockerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2003-07-10· cited 9×
- Spenlinhauer v. Spencer Press, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2011-12-28· cited 7×
- Merola v. Exergen Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1995-04-26· cited 5×
- Rodriguez v. MontalvoD. Massachusetts· 2004-01-12· cited 4×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hull v. Celanese Corp.Second Circuit· 1975-03-26· cited 238×
- Rice v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1977-04-14· cited 136×
- Reardon v. Marlayne, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-07-17· cited 87×
- Schrottman v. BarnicleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-06-29· cited 75×
- Ross v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-01-11· cited 74×
- Cormier v. CartyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-08-01· cited 66×
- Alvin W. Fullmer v. George Harper, Individually and as PresidentTenth Circuit· 1975-06-10· cited 55×
- McCourt Co., Inc. v. FPC Properties, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-05-06· cited 29×
- Atwood v. First National Bank of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1974-12-13· cited 7×
- Lemelson v. Synergistics Research Corp.S.D. New York· 1981-01-08· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.