Skip to main content
· 7/19/1985

Maietta v. International Harvester Co.

Citations

  • 496 A.2d 286
  • 1985 Me. LEXIS 786

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[D]efense counsel failed to preserve the objection that is now being pressed. The difference in testimony does not rise to the level of obvious error affecting substantial rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nichols, Roberts, Viol-Ette, Wathen, Glassman, Scol-Nik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.