· 7/19/1985
Maietta v. International Harvester Co.
Citations
- 496 A.2d 286
- 1985 Me. LEXIS 786
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[D]efense counsel failed to preserve the objection that is now being pressed. The difference in testimony does not rise to the level of obvious error affecting substantial rights.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nichols, Roberts, Viol-Ette, Wathen, Glassman, Scol-Nik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.