Maiers v. Roy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that where an appellant violated his conditions of release while on both supervised and conditional release, the DOC was authorized to re-imprison him until the expiration of his conditional-release term
• stating that a DWI offender’s terms of supervised and conditional release are “necessarily concurrent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Heilman v. Courtney
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2019-04-24· cited 2×
• State ex rel. Huseby v. Roy
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2017-10-09· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Humes
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-07-09· cited 63×
• General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin v. Wozniak Travel, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-03-19· cited 55×
• State v. Calmes
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-08-23· cited 43×
• State v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-04-17· cited 15×
• State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Fabian
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-06-29· cited 12×
• Aziz v. Fabian
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-12-14· cited 10×
• Joelson v. O'KEEFE
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-05-18· cited 8×
• In Re Robledo
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-06-06· cited 7×