Maier v. Santucci

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that to decline to grant a new trial under these circumstances would be an abuse of a trial court’s discretion
• holding that the jury was required to return a verdict of at least minimal damages because the medical experts for both sides agreed that the plaintiff had suffered an injury as a result of the accident
• “In light of uncontradicted medical testimony that [the plaintiff] suffered an injury as a result of the accident, the jury’s award of [no] damages is inadequate and unacceptable as a matter of law.”
• “aggravation of a preexisting condition is compensable under Delaware law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).