Maier v. Patterson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “impeding the exercise of Title I substantive rights by intimidation ... was actionable as a violation of the substantive right.”
• “The assault could be interpreted as having the purpose of attempting to chill the right of free speech of those members, including [Plaintiff], to press their grievance concerns or to complain of [the union trustee’s] representation of them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).