Maida Ludvik Sheris v. The Travelers Insurance Company, Maida Ludvik Sheris v. The Travelers Insurance Comapny

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that by deducting from the third-party action fees the fees incurred because of the worker’s adversary position, the court upheld the mandate of the apportionment statute requiring that the interests of both parties be fully observed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).