Skip to main content
· 1/15/2014

Maida Dzakula v. John McHugh

Citations

  • 746 F.3d 399
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 913
  • 121 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 636
  • 2014 WL 128605

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding judicial estoppel although the plaintiff amended her bankruptcy schedules, because “she has not provided any explanation whatsoever as to why the pending action was not included on her schedules in the first place”
  • “Plaintiff presented no evidence, 8 by affidavit or otherwise, explaining her initial failure . . . Nor did [plaintiff] ever 9 attempt to supplement the record with a declaration or any other evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hawkins, Graber, Christen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.