Skip to main content
· 6/11/1982

Mai v. Youtsey

Citations

  • 646 P.2d 475
  • 231 Kan. 419
  • 73 Oil & Gas Rep. 268
  • 1982 Kan. LEXIS 296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The express contract is proven by testimony showing the promise and the acceptance, whereas the implied contract is inferred from the acts of the parties and other circumstances showing an intent to contract.”
  • “In Kansas, quantum meruit and restitution are recognized as equivalent theories.”
  • elements of unjust enrichment under Kansas law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.