· 6/11/1982
Mai v. Youtsey
Citations
- 646 P.2d 475
- 231 Kan. 419
- 73 Oil & Gas Rep. 268
- 1982 Kan. LEXIS 296
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The express contract is proven by testimony showing the promise and the acceptance, whereas the implied contract is inferred from the acts of the parties and other circumstances showing an intent to contract.”
- “In Kansas, quantum meruit and restitution are recognized as equivalent theories.”
- elements of unjust enrichment under Kansas law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schroeder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.