Mai Systems Corp. v. C.U. Technologies, Inc. (In Re Mai Systems Corp.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding debtor was not judicially estopped from bringing claims in adversary proceeding simply because they were omitted from its initial disclosures
• “[0]nly creditors of a debtor have an obligation to determine and file claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).