Skip to main content
· 11/4/1977

Mahroom v. Hook

Citations

  • 563 F.2d 1369
  • 16 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 130
  • 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 10920
  • 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 7953

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the omission of the five titles” left the grant “in those five books ... intact” and unaffected by the termination notice
  • describing “Morton’s Fork” in the context of a different legal dispute
  • “the few purported similarities either are so general as to be meaningless, or are not similarities at ah”
  • “[njaturally there are certain similarities required by Tarzan’s character and the jungle setting”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.