Mahony v. Malcom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• awarding only two-fifths of the requested amount as original work on the basis that the remaining three-fifths of the requested fees were “presumptively multiplicative and superfluous.”
• “Plaintiffs would have encountered additional challenges to proving damages given the parties’ dueling expert reports.”
• awarding 0.12% of a settlement fund to six class representatives

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).