Mahoney v. United States Marshals Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that there was no RFRA violation where the plaintiffs did not “allege that their religion compels them to demonstrate in favor of the public display of the Ten Commandments at all time and in all places”
• dismissing RFRA claim because plaintiffs “do not allege that their religion compels them to engage in [religious] speech at the time and place and in the manner at issue here”
• “The governmental interest in protecting those in attendance at the Red Mass is quite significant and, indeed, it is compelling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).