Mahoney v. Sharff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “As he is an attorney and prepared the contract, if there is any ambiguity in it we must construe the contract most strongly against him.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gonzales v. Gonzales
  California Court of Appeal· 1975-09-12· cited 15×
• Untiedt v. Grand Laboratories, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-07-30· cited 8×
• Coons v. Kary
  California Court of Appeal· 1968-07-01· cited 4×
• Knight v. Aqui
  N.D. California· 2013-09-05· cited 3×
• Fulop v. Grissom
  California Court of Appeal· 1979-12-11· cited 1×
• Estate of Ott
  California Court of Appeal· 1979-12-11

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Weil v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1950-05-05· cited 16×
• Krieger v. Bulpitt
  California Supreme Court· 1953-01-06· cited 15×
• Blackburn v. Blackburn
  California Court of Appeal· 1958-05-12· cited 12×
• Dalzell v. State Bar
  California Supreme Court· 1936-05-26· cited 10×
• State ex rel. Arthur v. Superior Court
  Washington Supreme Court· 1910-03-29· cited 10×
• Collins v. Welsh
  California Court of Appeal· 1934-11-08· cited 9×
• McManus v. Montgomery
  California Supreme Court· 1938-11-28· cited 9×
• Schwartz v. Schwartz
  California Court of Appeal· 1959-08-28· cited 8×
• Abbott v. Hauschild
  California Court of Appeal· 1952-09-30· cited 4×
• Culley v. Badgley
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1917-05-31· cited 4×
• McClintock v. Bathurst
  California Court of Appeal· 1937-11-29· cited 3×
• Miller v. Wing
  California Court of Appeal· 1935-10-15· cited 3×