Mahoney v. Mentz's Assignee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• human intervention was not required when the system loaded thousands of numbers into the dialer to be called and then transferred the call upon a human answering
• \A determination on treble damages is left for a jury.\
• “Defendant’s system cannot randomly or sequentially generate telephone numbers but' the system has the capacity to store and dial random sequential numbers if provided with a list of such numbers which is uploaded into a mapping field specifically designed] to receive such a list.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).