Skip to main content
· 9/30/2009

Mahoney v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 662 F. Supp. 2d 74
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90231
  • 2009 WL 3126620

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that plaintiffs were not similarly situated to other groups permitted to chalk public streets
  • “With respect to any ‘as-applied’ challenge, it is well settled that the permissible mode of regulating the use of a traditional public forum is summarized under the familiar heading ‘time, place and manner.’” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellen Segal Huvelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.