· 9/2/1983
Mahoney v. Crocker National Bank
Citations
- 571 F. Supp. 287
- 114 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2590
- 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14071
- 33 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 34,179
- 32 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1482
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that 13 where plaintiffs “were appointed in accordance with [bank’s] bylaws” they were “officers of [the 14 bank] and so subject to the provisions of the National Bank Act regarding officers”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aguilar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.