Skip to main content
· 9/2/1983

Mahoney v. Crocker National Bank

Citations

  • 571 F. Supp. 287
  • 114 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2590
  • 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14071
  • 33 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 34,179
  • 32 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that 13 where plaintiffs “were appointed in accordance with [bank’s] bylaws” they were “officers of [the 14 bank] and so subject to the provisions of the National Bank Act regarding officers”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aguilar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.