Mahon v. Mahon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Of course the burden rested on plaintiff to prove the amount by which the improvements placed upon the land by her enhanced its value at the time of trial.”
• “Of course the burden rested on plaintiff to prove the amount by which the improvements placed upon the land by her enhanced its value at the time of trial.”
• “[W]hen improvements built by a cotenant enhance the value of the common estate and the cotenants are not injured in any way, or hindered from having partition, they should not be permitted to take advantage of the improvements, to which they contributed nothing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Coyle v. Kujaczynski
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2008-11-13· cited 10×
• Mahon v. Mahon
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1965-03-09· cited 4×
• George W. Gleason and Theodore Alan Gleason, Trustees of the Theodore Alan Gleason Trust, Partition v. Gayle F. Gleason, Partition
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2015-12-23
• Richard Grout as Trustee of the Helen Schardein 2018 Revocable Trust v. Dan R. Sickels
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2023-01-27

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Killmer v. Wuchner
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1890-05-08· cited 14×