Mahnick v. Bell Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If the meaning of the language [of a contract] is unclear, the trier of fact must determine the intent of the parties.”
• “If the meaning of the language [of a contract] is unclear, the trier of fact must determine the intent of the parties.”
• “Because the contract is subject to more than one reasonable interpretation, factual development is necessary to determine the intent of the parties and summary disposition is inappropriate.”
• “Because the contract is subject to more than one reasonable interpretation, factual development is necessary to determine the intent of the parties and summary disposition is inappropriate.”
• MSRA was inapplicable where the plaintiff-appraiser, was not a salesperson who sold “goods” and the defendant-contractor did not produce, sell, or distribute a “product” but rather the plaintiff provided a service

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).