Mahmoud Cherif Bassiouni v. Central Intelligence Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Glomar doctrine is well established
• CIA could “not contend that the contents of all [requested] documents [] [we]re classified” where they “certain[l]y . . . contain[ed] many U.N. reports, newspaper clippings, and 14 other non-classified materials”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).