Skip to main content
· 6/14/2004

Mahl v. Aaron

Citations

  • 809 N.E.2d 953
  • 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 1104
  • 2004 WL 1302783

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to address equal protection argument under Indiana Constitution when argument at trial was based only on federal constitution
  • “The statute unambiguously limits exemptions to Indiana domiciliaries.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vaidik, Sharpnack, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.