Skip to main content
· 9/30/2014

Mahindra & Mahindra, Ltd. v. Holloway Motor Cars of Manchester, LLC & a.

Citations

  • 166 N.H. 740

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating defendant did not waive objection to jurisdiction because it did not address the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims
  • stating existence of waiver based solely upon a letter is question of law and reviewed de novo
  • stating when waiver is based solely upon letter, we will review finding de novo
  • listing actions that constitute waiver of objection to service of process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conboy, Dalianis, Hicks, Bassett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.