Maher v. Tietex Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the discovery rule applies to breach of contract actions, and pursuant to the discovery rule, the action accrues on the date the aggrieved party knew or could have discovered the breach through the exercise of reasonable diligence
• stating the discovery rule applies to breach of contract actions, and pursuant to the discovery rule, the action accrues on the date the aggrieved party knew or could have discovered the breach through the exercise of reasonable diligence
• The court rejects plaintiffs argument that the change in his pay constituted a “continuing wrong” that triggered a new limitations period with each pay check.
• \The jury must resolve conflicting evidence as to whether a claimant knew or should have known he had a cause of action.\
• \The jury must resolve conflicting evidence as to whether a claimant knew or should have known he had a cause of action.\
• “The jury must resolve conflicting evidence as to whether a claimant knew or should have known he had a cause of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).