Skip to main content

Maher v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.

Citations

  • 207 Pa. Super. 472
  • 218 A.2d 593
  • 1966 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • setting forth that under the traveling employee doctrine, a traveling employee’s “continuity of employment is not broken unless the employe’s activity constitutes an abandonment of employment.”
  • setting forth that under the traveling employee doctrine, a traveling employee’s “continuity of employment is not broken unless the [J-71-2020] - 9 employe’s activity constitutes an abandonment of employment.”
  • employee not disqualified from award of compensation for death in car accident which occurred some five hours after his completion of work despite fact that he had spent intervening hours drinking beer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ervin, Hoffman, Jacobs, Montgomery, Spaulding, Watkins, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.