Mahdi v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because there was no objection to alleged sentencing error in the trial/sentencing court, no issue had been preserved for the appellate court’s review
• holding that because there was no objection to alleged sentencing error in the trial/sentencing court, no issue had been preserved for the appellate court’s review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Mikal Mahdi v. Bryan Stirling
  Fourth Circuit· 2021-12-20· cited 54×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Byram
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-04-28· cited 57×
• State v. Hazel
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-01-23· cited 15×
• State v. Owens
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-07-14· cited 15×
• Ray v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-03-23· cited 11×