Skip to main content
· 4/11/2008

Mahdi v. Bagley

Citations

  • 522 F.3d 631
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 7766
  • 2008 WL 977042

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[n]o prejudice flows from the failure to raise a meritless claim”
  • “The Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee a criminal defendant an impartial jury in state court.”
  • “[F]ederal courts are not required to address a procedural-default issue before deciding against the petitioner on the merits.”
  • “federal courts are not required to address a procedural-default issue before deciding against the petitioner on the merits”
  • “[F]ederal courts are not required to address a procedural-default issue before deciding against the petitioner on the merits”
  • “‘[F]ederal courts are not required to address a procedural- default issue before deciding against the petitioner on the merits,’ especially where the procedural 22 default issue is ‘complicated’ and ‘is unnecessary to [the] disposition of the case.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Moore, Gibbons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.