Mahar v. StoneWood Transport

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding vicarious liability claims against employers for intentional torts require the agent’s tortious act to be foreseeable
• “Comment e to section 219(2)(d) acknowledges that the section is limited in its application to cases within the apparent authority of the employee, or when the employee’s conduct involves misrepresentation or deceit.”
• \serious intentional wrongdoing\ is clearly outside the scope of employment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).