Mahar v. Acuna, II

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the superior court erred by issuing a Brady Indicator because it failed to make necessary findings under both the Arizona Firearms Law and 18 U.S.C. § 922 underlying the Brady Indicator
• “Because [this Court] ha[s] resolved the appeal on other grounds, we need not address this issue.”
• signed order of protection issued after a hearing is a final, appealable order under the Rules of Protective Order Procedure, A.R.S. § 12-2101(A)(1), and A.R.S. § 12-2101(A)(5)(b)
• orders of protection appealable under § 12-2101(A)(5)(b) “without regard to whether it involves a firearms prohibition” and without certification of finality under Ariz. R. Fam. Law P. 78

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).