Skip to main content
· 7/9/2004

Mahana v. Onyx Acceptance Corp.

Citations

  • 2004 UT 59
  • 96 P.3d 893
  • 53 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1043
  • 507 Utah Adv. Rep. 34
  • 2004 Utah LEXIS 124
  • 2004 WL 1534124

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “To the extent possible, the fundamental purpose of compensatory damages is to place the plaintiff in the same position he would have occupied had the tort not been committed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parrish, Durham, Wilkins, Durrant, Nehring, Parrish'S

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.