Skip to main content
· 4/8/1975

Mahaffey v. Ahl

Citations

  • 214 S.E.2d 119
  • 264 S.C. 241
  • 1975 S.C. LEXIS 350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • it is axiomatic in this State that issues of negligence and proximate cause may be resolved by direct or circumstantial evidence
  • “it is axiomatic in this State that issues of negligence and proximate cause may be resolved by direct or circumstantial evidence”
  • \it is axiomatic in this State that issues of negligence and proximate cause may be resolved by direct or circumstantial evidence\
  • this Court held whether driver should have seen an individual approaching on a motorbike in time to stop or slow down to avoid an accident was a jury question
  • “It is elementary that in considering whether the court below erred in refusing [a motion for JNOV] . . . we must view the evidence and the inferences reasonably deducible therefrom in a light favorable to the respondent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ness, Moss, Lewis, Bussey, Littlejohn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.