Maguire v. Pabst Brewing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• meaning of “business purpose” within section 392 does not embrace situation where possession or control of chattel transferred to another
• no warning required of beer manufacturers because risks of intoxication to beer consumers are “sufficiently known to consumers at large.”
• under the negligence principles in section 389, the relevant inquiry is whether unreasonable hazard to the plaintiff is to be foreseen from the use of the article
• risk of intoxication from beer is “sufficiently known to consumers at large”
• risks sufficiently known to consumers at large
• risks sufficiently known to consumers at large

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).