Magritz v. Ozaukee County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• treating the plaintiff’s failure to respond to the defendants’ lack-of-subject-matter-jurisdiction argument as a concession of those arguments
• dismissing plaintiffs unlawful taking claim stemming from judicial foreclosure under Rooker-Feldman
• plaintiffs challenge to the tax sale of his property was barred by Rooker-Feldman because he directly “questioned] the validity of the underlying 2001 Judgment of Foreclosure”
• taking judicial notice of news articles for background purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).