Magnolia School District No. 14 v. Arkansas State Board of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that expenditure of school funds must be \confined to public schools\ and \absolutely necessary\ for proper maintenance of the school in the discretion of the directors.
• noting that this court will not order the State Treasurer to refund money already spent, as such an action would amount to a suit against the State
• declining to apply strict scrutiny in equal protection challenge to state's payment of federally-ordered costs in school desegregation cases
• payment of court-ordered attorneys fees for desegregation not an unlawful diversion of school funds under art. 14, § 2
• payment of certain federally mandated costs of desegregation cases and related attorney's fees
• moneys spent to further Pulaski County desegregation not unconstitutional diversion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).