Magnolia Mountain Ltd. Partnership v. Ski Rio Partners, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that it was “unlikely that the defense of unclean hands [was] applicable” to a foreclosure action in part because “there [had] been no allegation of impropriety in the execution of the note and mortgage”
• affirming trial court’s decision that promissory estoppel was inapplicable where there was no evidence of a promise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).