Skip to main content
· 3/2/2001

Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc. v. Imaging Systems International

Citations

  • 543 S.E.2d 32
  • 273 Ga. 525
  • 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 768
  • 2001 Ga. LEXIS 198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a “jury question arises only when there appears to be an ambiguity in the contract which cannot be negated by the court’s application of the statutory rules of construction.” (punctuation omitted)
  • “prevailing party’ is “[a] party in whose favor a judgment is rendered, regardless of the amount of damages awarded”
  • a claim for attorney fees must be based on obtaining some of the relief sought
  • “[t]he laws which exist at the time and place of the making of a contract[ ] enter into and form a part of it”
  • party that does not prevail on any of its claims cannot obtain attorney fees
  • failure to obtain relief that was being sought foreclosed an award of attorney fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.