Magnesystems, Inc. v. Nikken, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that two patents, which were more than 15 years old, could have been discovered with due diligence before the trial court ruled upon a motion for summary judgment
• denying motion for leave to file 14 amended unclean hands defense because (1) “Plaintiff’s alleged misconduct has no direct 15 relationship to the [infringed] Patent or Plaintiff’s conduct in obtaining the patent-in-suit;” 16 and (2
• “[A]n issue or factual argument waived at the trial level before a particular order is appealed, or subsequently waived on appeal, cannot be revived on remand.”
• “[A]n issue ... waived on appeal!] cannot be revived on remand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).