Magill v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because “a preliminary hearing is ordinarily a much less searching exploration into the merits of a case than that of a trial, ... the rules of evidence are not applied as rigidly” at a preliminary hearing as they are at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Perkins v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1985-03-15· cited 13×
• Wyrick v. District Court of Mayes County
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1992-08-20· cited 3×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Shapard v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1967-11-20· cited 74×
• In Re Habeas Corpus of Bishop
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1968-06-26· cited 23×
• Parmenter v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1963-01-02· cited 14×