Skip to main content
· 11/8/1951

Magida ex rel. Vulcan Detinning Co. v. Continental Can Co.

Citations

  • 12 F.R.D. 74
  • 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3493

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Protective orders that limit access to certain documents to counsel and experts only are commonly entered in litigation involving trade secrets and other confidential research, development, or commercial information”
  • “utilization of only one expert may be penny-wise ..., but [pjlaintiff having invoked the Court’s process must be prepared to make expenditures necessary to proceed to a prompt trial of this action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaufman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.