Skip to main content
· 7/6/1981

Magid v. Marcal Paper Mills, Inc.

Citations

  • 517 F. Supp. 1125
  • 28 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1476
  • 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13347

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • either substantive volume of business or continuity of operation in Delaware is sufficient under subsection (c)(4)
  • where complaint alleged defendant breached legal duty under Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 US. C. § 621, et seq., plaintiff alleged tortious injury under Delaware long arm statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.