Skip to main content
· 4/19/2024

Maggitti, U. v. PA Supreme Court Justices

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • identifying “[i]nsufficient agency attention,” “[s]tatutory ambiguity,” “[d]earth of circuit law,” and “[i]mportance of the issue” as reasons counseling remand as a prudential matter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.