Skip to main content
· 1/9/1996

Maggio v. Liztech Jewelry

Citations

  • 912 F. Supp. 216
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 461
  • 1996 WL 17155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that communication of suspected copyright infringement was protected by qualified privilege where it served legitimate and shared business purpose
  • per se defamatory to describe a competitor’s merchandise designs to have been ‘purloined’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mentz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.