Mafuri v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Marrama's power to revoke the trust became property of the chapter 7 estate, exercisable by the chapter 7 trustee
• noting that “courts have rejected attempts to focus the Section 1113 inquiry on a proposal made by a party other than the debtor”
• noting that “nothing in Section 1113 itself ... supports the notion that a collective bargaining right can exist in perpetuity. Indeed, the case law says otherwise.”
• denying section 1113 motion without prejudice, where necessity in most, but not all, respects was shown
• the matter of valuation of an ongoing business in economic distress is far from an exact science
• “The Debtor bears the burden of proof by the preponderance of the evidence on the elements of Section 1113.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).