Maeztu v. Brownell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding amendment would cause undue delay and be prejudicial where it would allege “new facts that will require additional discovery”
• denying leave to amend to add claims that “differ[ed] in character and purpose from those articulated in the initial complaint”
• finding undue prejudice where the case had been pending for two years, discovery had been completed, and the defendant had previously filed for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).