Maewal v. Adventist Health Systems/Sunbelt, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defining malice in Texas peer review immunity provision as \knowledge that an allegation is false or with reckless disregard for whether the allegation is false\
• defining malice in Texas peer review immunity provision as “knowledge that an allegation is false or with reckless disregard for whether the allegation is false”
• \[t]he peer review process is analogous to an employer's performance assessment of an employee or an employer's investigation into an employee's alleged wrongdoing\
• “[t]he peer review process is analogous to an employer’s performance assessment of an employee or an employer’s investigation into an employee’s alleged wrongdoing”
• “Evidence which favors the movants’ position will not be considered unless it is uncontroverted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).