Maestri v. Jutkofsky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding breach of privilege to be impermissible in First Amendment inquiry, and distinguishing constitutional inquiries in which “Courts have expressly deemed [motive] a substantive element”
• determining the “collective motivation of legislatures” based upon the statements of a few individuals “is a perilous enterprise indeed”
• “Determining the subjective intent of legislators and the collective motivation of legislatures is a perilous enterprise indeed.”
• determining the “collective motivation of legislatures” based upon the statements of a few individuals “is a perilous enterprise indeed”
• rejecting a teachers union’s First Amendment retaliation claim challenging South Carolina’s elimination of its state-sponsored collection of union dues through payroll deductions
• no First Amendment implications to statute that discriminated on the basis of speaker in authorizing payroll deduction for some public employee organizations but not others

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).