Maestas v. Day & Zimmerman, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, “given [plaintiff’s] approximately equal division of time between his field lieutenant and [office] duties, there remain genuine questions about which of his duties are primary” and therefore summary judgment on the administrative exemption was improper
• stating that field supervisors— including lieutenants, captains, and majors — “like all members of the force, wear uniforms”
• shift supervisor in the production department of an auto parts manufacturer was an exempt executive
• “Because the primary duty inquiry presents a question of fact, summary judgment is proper only if there [is] no genuine dispute regarding plaintiffs’ primary duties.”
• “[S]ummary judgment is appropriate only if all reasonable factfinders would conclude that the managerial portions of plaintiffs’ jobs are their ‘primary duties.’”
• “[S]ummary judgment is appropriate only if all reasonable factfinders would conclude that the managerial portions of plaintiffs’ jobs are their ‘primary duties.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).