Skip to main content
· 10/7/2013

Maersk Drilling United States, Inc. v. Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc.

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 381
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 20
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3178
  • 571 U.S. 810
  • 2013 WL 5507412
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that, under Article 11, “unpaid taxes and other assessments automatically become a lien against the property” after a certain period of time has passed
  • holding arguments not raised in district court to be forfeited on appeal
  • referring to “the much more common due-process chal- lenge in which a plaintiff contests the sufficiency of a notice that failed to reach its intended recipient”
  • instructing district court to dismiss state-law claims without prejudice to be refiled in state court to allow “state court to decide the [] state-law claims itself based on its understanding of its own law . . .”
  • “It remains ■ the law of this Circuit that the Oneidas’ reservation was. not disestablished.”
  • “[W]e have repeatedly said that if a plaintiffs federal claims are dismissed before trial, the state law claims should be dismissed as well.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.