Maercks v. Birchansky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that counsel's argument commenting on the expense of past medical expenses was improper when there was no claim for past medical expenses as damages
• display of cancelled checks excluded from evidence warrants new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).